BIOFIELD AND BIOTELEPATHY by Ron Hruby
OF BIOFIELD METER EXPERIMENTS
JULIAN N. KENYON M.D.
SEAN M. FURJANIC, M.S., P.E.
Harold S Cober wrote:
Ron Hruby, a Ph.D. in electrical
engineer, and retired NASA scientist, made his own version of a Biofield
Meter, from reading the book, and did careful experiments on remote healing
(videotaping movements of the Biofield Meter). Descriptions of his
experiments are included in the Spin Force book.
Below is part of an article in the
Spin Book, under Remote Healing.
THE BIOFIELD AND BIOTELEPATHY
By Buryl Payne and Ron Hruby
Introduction and Background
That thought is a
force like the other forces of physics has long been suspected and even
stated by many spiritual teachers. Now we can verify the truth of
Some years ago a
biological force was accidentally discovered by Buryl Payne, a
physicist/psychologist, while investigating another topic. The
force was measured by suspending a frame with magnets over a subject’s
head. The frame was observed to rotate a few degrees.
Initially, the rotation was thought to be an artifact, possibly due to
random air currents, or vibrations of the building. But careful
observations showed the rotation to be always in the same direction (to
the right as seen from within). Small frames, laden with small
magnets (magnets were eventually shown to be not needed the Biofield is
not magnetic) were placed in airtight bottles to eliminate the
possibility of wind currents. When subjects placed their hands
around the bottle, rotations were consistently observed. Healers
and young children usually produced greater rotation. The
direction of rotation of the frames was found to temporarily reverse
when the Moon was new or full, or there were solar flares and
geomagnetic activity. Solar activity in turn was found to be
related to the positions of the planets, a fact not generally known.
Therefore this biological force, which is over one million times as
large as the body’s magnetic force, shows that humans are connected with
events of the entire solar system. We are not isolated groups of
cells of protoplasm, nor are we merely passive passengers on ‘Spaceship
Earth’; we are part of a dynamic, interacting solar system, and perhaps
even more, as our Sun surely responds to emanations from other stars and
probably the Galactic Center as well.
The discovery led
to a world wide meditation/visualization experiment to see if people
could raise the Space Station Skylab to a higher orbit as it was about
to crash into Earth. At this time Biofield Meters were made in
small bottles and sold for home experimenters.
In 2000, Dr. Ron
Hruby carried out experiments showing that the amplitude of this spin
force (as measured by a version of Buryl Payne’s device) could be
influenced by people sending compassionate love to a subject. In
eighteen trials, he obtained 100% correlation between times of
visualization on the subject’s health and times of marked change of the
Biofleld. Essentially Dr. Ruby showed that loving thoughts have
a measurable force. This was an amazing discovery.
The rest of the article can be found
in the Spin book.
Back to Top
REPORT OF BIOFIELD METER EXPERIMENTS
Shemaya Laurel and friends, 2006
Meter from Buryl Payne. We added yarns from the central mirror to
each corner of the square dowel frame, to prevent the frame from
twisting out of its square shape. Previous to this addition, the
dowels tended to move out of their horizontal plane, with opposite
corners raised or lowered, and each dowel at an angle. Due to
complications with the available space, we did not use a scale on the
wall to measure degree of twist observed.
made whenever convenient, at times when the Biofield Meter was observed
to be completely stationary. These moments were somewhat rare,
most likely due to air currents from individuals moving about the house,
and drafts in this old building when the air moves outside.
individuals participated in testing the meter, depending upon who was
available when the meter was stationary. Results varied depending
upon who sat under the meter. All four individuals were women,
varying in age from 24 to 52. In total, approximately 50 tests
were made, over approximately 2 months time.
age 24 and quite healthy, had the strongest response from the meter.
Three times, with no bumping of the meter while moving her head into
position underneath it, the meter moved substantially, approximately 1/8
turn, or 45°, in a clockwise direction. One time, with that
individual, the meter moved counterclockwise, less than 45°.
Sometimes there was no movement, or only slight movement, which was
unclear if it was related to the process of getting positioned beneath
individual, myself, experienced movement sometimes, and other times none
whatsoever. Once the movement was dramatic, close to 90°
clockwise, but generally the movement was subtle, perhaps 10 to 15°.
Generally clockwise, sometimes counterclockwise. At the time I was
age 48, with substantial long-term health problems.
The third person
was striking in that one time the meter moved counterclockwise, 10 to
15°, but generally it would not move at all. That individual was
in good health, age 52.
individual experienced no movement, but was only available for one
I have been
concerned about both air currents and bumping of the meter influencing
the action of the meter. Even small strands of hair, as people are
positioning themselves underneath the meter, have been enough to
completely interfere with a measurement, causing obvious movement from
the mechanical interference. However, the striking thing about
this series of experiments was that there were several instances where
it was absolutely clear that there was no outside interference, and the
presence of the person's head underneath and within the meter correlated
with substantial movement of the meter, when previous to the person
being in the meter there was no movement whatsoever. This was
truly stunning. When my health allows, I look forward to pursuing
further work with the Biofield Meter, including setting up an
arrangement that stops airflow while allowing somebody to position
themselves beneath the meter.
Back to Top
LETTER BY JULIAN N. KENYON M.D.
Back to Top
LETTER BY SEAN M.
FURJANIC, M.S., P.E.
Back to Top
Harold S Cober wrote:
Buryl Payne, Ph.D.
This is a brief statement explaining my experience with
the practical use of Dr. Payne’s Biofield Meter. I have used it with
great satisfaction for about 10 years. I am presently “retired” but
do research in my home lab that sometimes still involves the meter. I
have done extensive healing energy research at “Life Forces Research
Foundation“, Flagler Beach, Florida and at “The Healing Place” in
Beach, Florida. I have a Ph.D. in Thermodynamics and am a Certified
Medicine Analyst. I am founder of Vibrational Religion, Vyofeedback,
Vyosonics, Hydrostatic Therapy, to name a few.
I have found the Payne Biofield Meter invaluable in determining which
direction to turn a client on our Vyotable. We accidentally discovered
that counterclockwise or clockwise direction is critical in acquiring
beneficial results in brain hemisync and balancing of the human energy
field. I suggest that CCW and CW spin are superimposed and these
oscillations travel in both directions simultaneously -- the direction
spin detected is determined by which one is dominant at the time. Our
research has suggested that a slight CCW motion is the healthiest. Of
course a healer might be expected to be exuding CW motion. I agree
Dr Payne that this energy is pre-electromagnetic.
We have employed many instruments and methods in verifying the
and efficacy of the Payne Biofield Meter including Telemetry EEG,
Imaging, The Egely Wheel, Aura-in- Motion, Resonant Field Imaging by
and others. I am convinced that Payne’s
Meter is irreplaceable for our application. In a matter of minutes we
determine the direction and timing of the healing and enlightening
sessions, as well as quickly assess after session results.